Yves Saint Laurent (YSL) lipsticks have long held a coveted spot in the beauty world, renowned for their luxurious textures and vibrant shades. The YSL Rouge Pur Couture The Slim (often referred to as the "slim" or "new" YSL), and its predecessor, the classic YSL Rouge Pur Couture (often called the "round" or "old" YSL), are particularly popular. Among the many shades, #80 has garnered significant attention, often described as a juicy tomato red. However, this shade, despite its alluring color, has generated mixed reviews, primarily focusing on its texture. This article will delve into a comprehensive analysis of YSL 80, examining its color payoff, texture concerns, application, longevity, and overall worth, incorporating various perspectives and experiences.
The initial excitement surrounding YSL 80 stems from its vibrant, yet wearable, tomato red hue. Described as a "watery, juicy orange-red" akin to a ripe little tomato, the shade is surprisingly versatile. Many reviewers have praised its ability to brighten the complexion, making it a flattering choice for a range of skin tones, particularly those with warmer undertones. The color is described as being both bright and natural, suitable for everyday wear or more glamorous occasions. Several swatches taken in natural evening light with an iPhone's rear camera and bare lips, without filters, showcase the true, translucent nature of the color. This transparency contributes to its natural, everyday appeal, allowing the lip's natural color to subtly shine through.
However, the overwhelmingly positive comments regarding the color are sharply contrasted by widespread criticism of the lipstick's texture. This is where the YSL 80 experience takes a significant turn. Many users, including those with detailed reviews and swatches available online, report a significant departure from the expected YSL quality. The old YSL round tube formula was known for a more moisturizing, yet not overly glossy, finish. The new generation, however, has been described as excessively oily and slick. This "oily" texture is a recurring complaint. Instead of the smooth, comfortable application expected from a high-end lipstick, users have found the formula to be uneven in application, leaving a patchy finish. The oily nature also contributes to significant transfer, leading to smudging and the dreaded "lip-to-cup" issue. The issue of the lipstick transferring to teeth is a particularly common complaint, with many users reporting the need for constant checks and adjustments throughout the day.
This significant shift in texture from the previous generations of YSL lipsticks is a major point of contention. The "fake moisture" of the older formula, a term used to describe the appearance of hydration without the actual moisturizing properties, has been replaced with a genuine, yet overly abundant, oiliness. This has left many disappointed, questioning the value proposition of a high-end lipstick that compromises on its core functionality – smooth and even application. The descriptions used range from "greasy" and "too oily" to "slippery" and "difficult to control." This makes precise application challenging, leading to uneven color payoff and a less polished overall look. The disappointing texture is a recurring theme across various online reviews and swatches, consistently overshadowing the positive aspects of the color.
current url：https://wkwgeh.h534a.com/products/ysl-80-%E8%AF%95%E8%89%B2-72954
hermes versand frankreich nach deutschland hermes jardin nil eau parfumee